psychic reading

=-=-=!OMFG!=-=-= THIS is the SICKEST thing EVER seen on GOOGLE MAPS!

Facebook Fan Page: =-=-=!OMFG!=-=-= THIS is the SICKEST thing EVER seen on GOOGLE MAPS!

Click an image below to see it full screen

= =  =!OMFG!=  = = THIS is the SICKEST thing EVER seen on GOOGLE MAPS!

= =  =!OMFG!=  = = THIS is the SICKEST thing EVER seen on GOOGLE MAPS!

= =  =!OMFG!=  = = THIS is the SICKEST thing EVER seen on GOOGLE MAPS!

Cool (38) Fail (61) Funny (60) Gross (66) Sad (84) Stupid (26) WTF (58)

Categories: Hidden Images
  1. TheBoxNinja
    July 26th, 2010 at 08:53 | #1

    plausible, and hilarious.

  2. gehehadjqhrqhdhafjwkacjqtkwtjgajatbKwtysj
    July 27th, 2010 at 01:15 | #2

    This is so obviously shopped. I don’t even need to look at the pixels.

  3. halfbear
    July 27th, 2010 at 07:26 | #3

    what’s so sick about it? It’s a deer lying on the ground! And yeah, it looks shopped

  4. izzy
    July 27th, 2010 at 07:45 | #4

    wot a lot of shit so its bambie,s mum she died years ago when i was a kid im over it lol x

  5. Hungry one
    July 27th, 2010 at 13:13 | #5

    Silly deer, Roads are for people driving cars!! On a lighter note, tonight’s special: BBQ Venison Burgers! Fries and Cole slaw included.

  6. :l
    July 27th, 2010 at 20:04 | #6

    ?? the deer is on the road in the 2nd picture and on the grass in the third? i dont think it would have that much momentum to move there after being hit

  7. fiachrahackett
    July 28th, 2010 at 00:23 | #7

    I think it’s supposed to be that the google guys taking the photo hit the deer

  8. Kate
    July 28th, 2010 at 03:49 | #8

    wow?! its a deere on the road, it aint the sickest thing on google maps! you can tell it was shopped:/.

  9. >.>
    July 28th, 2010 at 14:35 | #9

    PHOTOSHOP FAIL

  10. panda
    July 28th, 2010 at 15:02 | #10

    HAHAHAHAHAH owned

  11. Anonymous
    July 28th, 2010 at 19:31 | #11

    Iv’e shot plenty of those motherfuckers in my life and I feel nothing sick about it.

  12. billybob
    July 28th, 2010 at 21:16 | #12

    You dont even need to look at the pixels…

    YOU FUCKING MORON
    do you have any idea what a pixel is?!
    What kind of shitty screen ress are you running!
    every single image on a screen is made up of a pixel, photoshoped or not.
    Looking at ‘pixels’ doesnt tell you jack shit.

    EXIF data on image tell you if its been photoshoped or not difinitevly

  13. Ash
    July 28th, 2010 at 21:42 | #13

    This is probably one of the worst Photoshop attempts i’ve ever come across o_o

  14. lol!!!!!!!!!!rofl!!!!!!!!!!lol
    July 29th, 2010 at 01:50 | #14

    this has deinetly beeen shopped dont u now about “PIXLES” get a FUCKING LIFE MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  15. you’redumb
    July 29th, 2010 at 05:01 | #15

    I find it hilarious how you guys don’t use your minds to realize how complex it is to fabricate a 360 degree panoramic picture like that on Google Earth. Of course the top and bottom is messed up because theres MULTIPLE layers of pictures overlaying each other to create one perfected panoramic picture. Now as to why the deer looks like it “Photoshopped” in is probably because one of the editors wanted to show the fawn [female deer for all you dumb idiots] in one piece before it turned to road kill.

  16. Anonymous
  17. not fake
  18. Momma
    July 29th, 2010 at 14:05 | #18

    I dunno, I really don’t see this being real. The lines on the road don’t even match up. I look at Google Map all the time, I have even saved pictures from it…they never look anything like that. If Google captured a deer being hit, it may appear to be fuzzy because of the sudden movement, but not distorted and the background wouldn’t be put together like a mismatched puzzle. If there were “layers of pictures overlaying each other” it would show up in straight angles and lines…even large boxlike pixels…NOT round “photo-edited” swipes. These photos show an obvious tampered pattern.

  19. Mirokufan
    July 29th, 2010 at 16:26 | #19

    Um…just sayin’, but it was pretty well known that the Google Streetview vehicle hit a deer…

  20. WTFLian
    July 31st, 2010 at 00:17 | #20

    >.> :
    PHOTOSHOP FAIL

    you are so correct

  21. corrector
    August 2nd, 2010 at 13:42 | #21

    @you’redumb
    a fawn is a baby deer
    male or female!
    whos the dumb idiot now

  22. t.o.o. cool
    August 2nd, 2010 at 14:18 | #22

    billybob ur any idiot. they mean that they dont need to compare the pixels of the deer with the pixels of the road to kno its a fake. not that they dont need to see pixels u retard. think next time before u go crazy on someones ass

  23. Troll
    August 2nd, 2010 at 21:36 | #23

    @not fake
    If you seriously think either the Guardian or Gizmodo qualify as reliable sources, I’m sorry to inform you of this, but you’re an idiot.

    @billybob
    Because obviously there’s no way they possibly could have edited the EXIF data too…

  24. Anonymous
    August 3rd, 2010 at 04:15 | #24

    you’redumb :
    because one of the editors wanted to show the fawn [female deer for all you dumb idiots] in one piece before it turned to road kill.

    @you’redumb
    A ‘fawn’ is a baby deer, regardless of gender. Watch yourself before you go calling childish names.

  25. bob
    August 3rd, 2010 at 13:28 | #25

    you’redumb :
    I find it hilarious how you guys don’t use your minds to realize how complex it is to fabricate a 360 degree panoramic picture like that on Google Earth. Of course the top and bottom is messed up because theres MULTIPLE layers of pictures overlaying each other to create one perfected panoramic picture. Now as to why the deer looks like it “Photoshopped” in is probably because one of the editors wanted to show the fawn [female deer for all you dumb idiots] in one piece before it turned to road kill.

    hey dumb idiot a fawn is just a baby deer. a female deer is a doe

Comment pages
1 2 5384